Abstract
Fast, and accurate prediction of ionic migration barriers (Em) is crucial for designing next-generation battery materials that combine high energy density with facile ion transport. Given the computational costs associated with estimating Em using conventional density functional theory (DFT) based nudged elastic band (NEB) calculations, we benchmark the accuracy in Em and geometry predictions of five foundational machine learned interatomic potentials (MLIPs), which can potentially accelerate predictions of ionic transport. Specifically, we assess the accuracy of MACE-MP-0, Orb-v3, SevenNet, CHGNet, and M3GNet models, coupled with the NEB framework, against DFT-NEB-calculated Em across a diverse set of battery-relevant chemistries and structures. Notably, MACE-MP-0 and Orb-v3 exhibit the lowest mean absolute errors in Em predictions across the entire dataset and over data points that are not outliers, respectively. Importantly, Orb-v3 and SevenNet classify ‘good’ versus ‘bad’ ionic conductors with an accuracy of >82%, based on a threshold Em of 500 meV, indicating their utility in high-throughput screening approaches. Notably, intermediate images generated by MACE-MP-0 and SevenNet provide better initial guesses relative to conventional interpolation techniques in >71% of structures, offering a practical route to accelerate subsequent DFT-NEB relaxations. Finally, we observe that accurate Em predictions by MLIPs are not correlated with accurate (local) geometry predictions. Our work establishes the use-cases, accuracies, and limitations of foundational MLIPs in estimating Em and should serve as a base for accelerating the discovery of novel ionic conductors for batteries and beyond.